The Schapelle Corby case is one that promises to hog the news for the foreseeable future. An article I read in the Border Mail offers the latest developments. Lawyers representing accused Australian drug-trafficker Schapelle Corby have claimed that the Australian Federal Police has shown a bewildering lack of co-operation may have condemned the former beauty student to 27 years in a Bali jail. The lawyers had a hard time getting the Australian government to admit there might be link between events in and around the Sydney airport and this case.
If this is part of a major set-up the manure is about to hit the fan. More likely is a guilty verdict with the young lady being able to serve part of her sentence back in Australia. I fully expect a lot of people to buy-into this case on an emotional level and completely ignore the most likely scenario. Looking around online there are sites supporting Schappelle.
If you want to offer your thoughts, advice, wishes please post them on Baliblog.
PRINT 
{ 107 comments }
← Previous Comments
We know you are inocent the Australian people are behind you!! schpelle be strong.This episode will also make me think long and hard about ever going to Bali on a holiday — for two reasons: in protest, and because I have no confidence that I would be protected from the same thing happening to me.
Davo!!
We know you are inocent the Australian people are behind you!! schpelle be strong.This episode will also make me think long and hard about ever going to Bali on a holiday — for two reasons: in protest, and because I have no confidence that I would be protected from the same thing happening to me.
Davo!!
We know you are inocent the Australian people are behind you!! schpelle be strong.This episode will also make me think long and hard about ever going to Bali on a holiday — for two reasons: in protest, and because I have no confidence that I would be protected from the same thing happening to me.
Davo!!
Today’s verdict in the Schapelle case should be seen as an insult
directed at all Australians! No clear thinking Australian would ever
dream of smuggling drugs from Australia into Bali to MAKE A FORTUNE!
Only certain Indonesian judges, for motives best known to themselves,
believe that the average Australian would be stupid enough to concoct
such a scheme. !! BOYCOTT ALL TRAVEL AGENCIES that don’t BOYCOTT BALI !!
Think of it the other way: What if it was an Indonesian woman, coming into Sydney with drugs in her bag. Would you accept an explanation that the baggage handlers put it in?
Why would a drug smuggler put over 4kg of marihuana (street value in Bali probably around $80.000?) in her surfbag and then not pick it up on the other side in Bali??? that does not make any sense right??? If I would be a drug smuggler you would know that the bag would never go through customs…
Why would a drug smuggler put over 4kg of marihuana (street value in Bali probably around $80.000?) in her surfbag and then not pick it up on the other side in Bali??? that does not make any sense right??? If I would be a drug smuggler you would know that the bag would never go through customs…
I must admit I was disturbed by the fact that the camera hardly left Schapelle’s face for 2 1/2 hrs of television.
Watching her struggle with all those emotions.
It’s hard to believe . . . 20 yrs and then they had the hide to fine her as well.
Now the prosecution has appealed because of the lenency of the sentence and Shapelle’s lawyers have appealed due to the severity of the sentence.
Meanwhile that Bali wanker who murdered (not killed) murdered all those people in the Bali bombing is running around whistling dixie.
Allahu Akbah you little slimey prick!
One thing that I’m a bit confused over and hopefully someone may help me with is this . . . the Forensic Evidence.
I know they said there was no trace of dope (the evil weed) in her blood or urine but I’m sure they said they found flower buds of dope on her clothing.
Does someone know for sure what was said about this?
Another point is that the Judges apparently convicted her because she wouldn’t point the finger at someone else, (her companions that is).
In other words they believed one of them, Schapelle or her friends were definitely guilty of smuggling the drugs.
Some people believe she has taken the rap for her brother.
This poor sod is in for a hell of a ride in the media now. I mean if Schapelle’s innocent, someones guilty, and it might as well be her brother!
It’s a bloody joke! The media that is.
Tll this day schpelle is inncocent. I could not beleive she was sentenced for 21 years plus a $14,000 fine. The bali murderer akbal got of scott free, but yet ther judges wont’ consider looking in to the hard core evidence of no finger prints match up, no drug history getting
21 years is unthinkably stupid.
There goes her life she cant marry start a family have children. Were did all our morals go? This is unhuman!!!
she gets 20 yrs and i feel is innocent… the bali bomber kills many and gets 2 years… thats WRONG!!!
Bloody disgusting, I can’t believe that the Bali bomber only got 18 months, should have cut his rocks off and chucked him in the ocean.
By the way did Shapelle take a lie detector?
Like millions of other people, i too watched the television broardcast of [the verdict] it was an extremly emotional experience. It took me back to the 20th july 1969, when as a primary school student we were allowed to leave school early in order to watch the [event]—the moon landing live on television. Ifeel the memory of schapelle corby standing in that court room, under those conditions, and with what she had to endure,will stay with me forever, just as the 1969 [event] has. As to her guilt or innocence, i do not know, i do believe however in the possibility of her innocence. My concern is what seems to be the poor standards regarding evidence. Many people have mentioned finger prints, it appears basic forensics were not carried out, what investigations of schapelle corby’s connections in bali, including family, members, friends, and associates, if any, have been conducted? The problem is, that no further evidence was required, The fact that the drug was in her boogie board bag meant whatever that bag contained was hers. The bali police are under no obligation to prove how it got there, nor where it originated from. they were only required to prove possesion, in thier view, the instant schapelle corby addmitted it was her bag, and drugs were found in it she was guilty of possesion. If she is innocent, and her explanation of events are true, the Australian airports, and the lack of security procedures therein are the reason she has become an innocent victim. The police procedures within bali leave a lot to be desired, as does thier entire juditial system. The Australian media has made millions of dollars from schapelle corby’s predicament, we can only hope the publicity it has generated will assist her in some way. I hope the Australian federal police will conduct a full investigation in to airport security regardless of pressure from polititions and companies not to disclose the results. If the boogie board bag had four kilograms of explosive????? I have worked in the security industry,[and i know from personal experience [16 years,] that security is always minimum, and often overlooked completely, It is only ever increased after a situation has occured. This applies to banks, armoured vehicles, shopping centres, fruit and veg markets, and yes even airports. THIS IS FACT. Schapelle corby has made serious allegations regarding Australian airports, the only way to rebuff these allegations is to prove it cannot and didnot happen. each and every worker hwo had acsess to luggage during this period of time should be qoestioned by Australian federal police, yes including security staff. I have been questioned by police on several occassions, as a matter of coarse, in order to elliminate me as a suspect, this also proved i had know prior knowledge of criminal activity that may have taken place. Again, i do hope schapelle corby will be brought back to Australia, away from those conditions, i would not travel to bali, well prior to this situation, the police are corrupt, and even the judge spoke to the media. To the Australian priminister Mr john howard, you sent all Australians the terrorist pamphlet, please save the paper,and instead SECURE OUR AIRPORTS. TO schapelle corby, i sincerely hope you will be brought back to Australia, keep your chin up. To everyone else DO NOT TRAVEL TO BALI AGAIN. Thankyou for opportunity to express myself TCB
Gazza – how can we judge someone on their emotional response? Too many tears? If she’d gone numb and not cried, some people would declare this was a demonstration of her guilt. You say she should be mad, not crying – haven’t you ever been so mad but defeated, and all you can do is cry? She has to face a grim reality every day, there’s no way you could sustain an enraged reaction.
To the person who asked how she could not notice the weight in her bodyboard bag, not only did she have 4 bags, as someone pointed out here, but the handle of her bodyboard bag had broken and she was dragging it.
Another thing – many are saying, in response to the idea that it is ridiculous to smuggle drugs to a country where the drugs lose value, that there is a market among Australians who want to be Aussie pot. Someone stated above who seems to know the case that this case is unprecedented and there have been no prior marijuana smuggling cases from Australia to Indonesia. So if there is such a huge demand for this over there, wouldn’t someone else have been caught before?
Bazza – You are right that people need to apply reason in coming to conclusions about this case. Yes, emotion can be blinding and when it leads to generalised hatred about ‘Asian countries’ and such, it’s problematic. But emotion and reason are not mutually exclusive – you can have a ‘feeling’ about this case and argue your points rationally too, which many people above have done. You are not personally demonstrating an ability to reason neutrally without any bias – some of your points are steeped in a suspiciousness and cynicism that makes your arguments unreasonable. Often, people who argue this point about separating emotion from reason fail to see that their arguments are quite emotive as well, it’s just a different emotion from sentimentality.
I am an everyday Australian (34 yr old Mum of 3)watching Schappelles life through the media. I am interested to know whether or not she was told of her rights prior to her baggage being opened or is customs allowed to search and interigate you without legal representation. I do not know the law but would be interested if anybody else would know of what legal rights Schappelle had at the airport and if the police did not give her that chance. Therefore they the police and customs officers broke any law? Stay strong Schappelle I pray for you and your family and hope you come home to AUSTRALIA soon.
here is the thing i don’t understand, why are some of us so certain she is innocent? people say “From the evidence we’ve seen”, what evidence did you see? the fact that she said “I swear its not mine”? (like any one would admit that bag of drug is theirs!), or people say there are some funky businesses going on in the bagage handlers department?
i would like to think she is innocent, i would like to think that we can live in a world that we don’t have worry about drugs, violence and any other horrible things us humans bring upon another. however, there is no hardcore evidence to prove bagage handler mr or ms X purposely putted this bag of drug in corby’s bag! its just so far a posibility! but not a fact!
The thing that really gets me is, i’ve heard some australians say, that even if she is guilty, she doesn’t deserve it! her mum said after the judgement “I hope the judges would say ‘guilty’ but you’ve done enough time for your crime here and its about time to go home.” ARE YOU KIDDING ME ?!!! is that all for a convicted drug “import/exporter”? if that bag of drug is hers, and she had every intension to make a profit from it, then i say that 20 years of jail is a little too light compare to life or death!
had said that, i hope she is innocent, i hope that someone will step out and say “hey, i’m the one who put the bag of drug in her bag, and its not her fault” but till that day happens, the evidence is overwhelmingly against her.
some of us say “indonesia court system is so corrupted”, like any of you will actually know! any justice system in the world, and yes including Australia is somewhat injustice! don’t believe it? then how does publicly stabbing and murder a mate gets maxium 5 year counts for justice? drink driving kills teenagers gets only a fine and loose license count for justice? or prehaps gang rape gets maxium 10 years screams justice! let’s face it, in a count room any where in the world, its not about what really happened, its about what you can prove.
like i said, i hope somehow she is innocent, but if she is not, then the judgement is beyond fair and is well deserved. but what really happend to her, we might just never know. and for those who watch a bit of tv and read of a few newspaper then sworn to defend her innocence, get a life!
You think 20 years is too light for marijuana!?! A sentence would be much lighter here, so this is why people think it’s unfair. Many people feel marijuana should be a decriminalised substance anyway, so in the grand scheme of things, yes, they think it’s incredibly unfair a girl loses most of her years over this. The prosecution argued 4000+ people would get ‘hurt’ from the marijuana if it hit the street! Hurt?! Just stoned!! Things like this are why the trial seems so unjust – I mean, that’s just a scientifically invalid argument and shouldn’t be allowed.
And to answer the first part – why do people assume she’s innocent. Well you’ve got some people who don’t know, but feel there is more than reasonable doubt so she doesn’t deserve to be convicted. And then others who feel the evidence that’s emerged (not just her claiming it’s not hers – read about the case more carefully) makes for a strong likelihood that someone planted it. Opinions in the real world, outside a court room, don’t have to be formed by rational deduction and be airtight. People are allowed to just find her believable. Even in a jury situation, this would factor in.
If I were in a situation where I was telling the truth but there was no proof, I’d hope someone would look in my eyes and just know I was telling the truth. So much human interaction depends on this, it is reductive to think our opinions and feelings on things can only be determined by cold, hard fact.
I thought some may be interested in this excerpt from the Sydney Newspaper The Sunday Telegraph, May 29, 2005.
Judge Defends Corby Verdict
The Indonesian Judge who jailed Schapelle Corby for 20 years yesterday likened her defence to “a crying competition” and claimed he slept easily after the decision. (This statement is in relation to Schapelle’s mother yelling out in court that the judges would never sleep again.)
Chief Judge Linton Sirait said his only reaction to the Australian public’s anger at the verdict was to point out that the case had been decided solely according to the law.
“I am responsible to God for my verdict, not to the people,” the devout Christiand said.
further on in the editorial . . .
“The judges took the verdict based on the evidence and facts found in the trial, such as the statements from the witnesses, other evidence and marijuana, the statement from the suspect, the statement from the experts.”
Character references and signed petitions declaring a view that Corby was innocent could not be used and were not used as part of the judges consideration of the verdict, Judge Sirait said.
The collection of signatures cannot be used to decide if somebody is guilty or not guilty.
A personal letter to the defence lawyer or to the judge is a personal letter; it is not evidence.”
further on . . .
Asked if he had any personal feelings towards Corby who had made a series of tearful pleas to the court asserting her innocence and begging the judges to set her free he said: “A judge is not allowed to bring his emotions to the case. The judge decides in accordance with the law.”
“A judges most important characteristic was honesty, Judge Sirait said.
“The judge’s duty is not difficult. The most important thing is that the judge is honest, and has no (conflicting) interest in the case.
“If we have conflict of interest, then it will be difficult.”
Well there you have it “strait from the horses mouth” or as the Sunday Telegraph reported.
This whole Corby thing is definetly designed and executed to make people fight each other, anyone who logically observe the whole thing will definetly know that.
The same goes for the Bali bomb, the Australian Embassy bomb, Timor Leste’s ‘liberation’, Iraq’s ‘liberation’, Indonesia’s ‘liberation’, the Guantanomo Bay incident, and so on.
This sort of thing is capable of making some people fight each other due that some people seems to be ignorant on some things and don’t realize that the people who are currently in controls of the Indonesian government are the same ones who are currently in controls of the Australian government and other ‘official’ governments in the world.
These same people also controls mass media around the world, big tourist companies, big airline companies, human rights organizations, ‘terror’ organisation, anti-’terror’ organisation, drug makers, anti-drugs organizations, and so on.
If you follow ‘their’ words, sure you wouldn’t find any connection between all of ‘their’ ‘proxies’. However if you use your own instinct (and not the instinct ‘they’ installed on you), you will know that all of them obeyed the same master and all of them are just mere ‘proxies’.
Personally, I don’t care on whether Corby is innocent or guilty. That’s none of my business or problem.
It’s her business, it’s her problem, it’s also the business and problem the people associated with the whole thing (the baggage handlers, the airports, the airline companies, the courts, and so on).
Ask yourself, if this isn’t your business or problem, why should you be all concern about it?
The problem with the world today might not be people not caring about other people, but instead more about people messing around with things that aren’t their business in the first place.
Now… What about this so called drug problems?
Easy, decriminalize drug making, dealing, and trafficking. That would have eliminate this whole thing. Interestingly, it’s only after the ‘reformation’ that Indonesia’s drug laws become stricter.
Perharps Corby should have made a plea to the former President Suharto to bail her out? Assuming that she don’t want to be proven guilty or serve time, maybe she was threatened to ‘accept’ the verdict guily to save her family back home from suffering (maybe someone back home have a case against her family?), or maybe coming back home and living back home would be a more scarrier experiences (Indonesia is where many people escaped to when they’re in trouble, not the other way around), or maybe she think can make more money by playing the innocent victim, and so on.
It would have been much better to make a plea at Suharto than to make a plea at Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono who is only a mere weak stooge like George Walker Bush, John Howard, Tony Blair, and so on.
As for what happened if there’s a boycott on Indonesia and/or Bali.
Australia got lots more to lose than Indonesia should things gone for the worse. Sure both countries are capable of living on their own, especially Indonesia with lots of natural resources and people (Indonesia don’t need tourism or even foreign debts… er, I mean ‘aids’, those things are usually force feed by foreign parties), but Australia would have their routes severly disconnected.
I don’t know on why some Australians gone nutty of the whole boycott thing, either for this one or another or another or another.
Are some of them trying to make people fight each other? Or are some of them aren’t actually Australians and/or have any loyalty toward Australia and therefore are trying to make Australia lose a lot? Or some of them lack common sense? Or are some of them are just plain on too much drugs and/or alcohols?
Here’s what happened:
The 4kg bag which was found in Corby’s boogie board bag was a decoy. The customs officials in Denpasar were tipped off to expect it. Meanwhile, a much larger consignment of marijuana was passing through Denpasar airport on the same day. Schapelle was the unwitting victim of a sting designed to divert attention from the real operation to import significant quantity of the drug into Bali.
The Australian government and Federal Police were the ones who tipped off the Indonesian customs agents. There is an entire complex subplot here involving closer co-operation between Australian and Indonesian governments. Lets just say that it suits certain Canberra agendas to have an Australian girl-next-door the focus of public attention at this time.
The Indonesians, initially reluctant to agree to the scheme proposed by the Australians, were convinced to go along with it by a promise to provide their own public relations coup in busting the Bali Nine. The AFP supplied the necessary information for the Indonesian police to be able to catch the low-level mules with heroin redhanded at Denpasar airport.
So there is a high-level political plot connecting both the Corby case and the Bali Nine and the emerging co-operation between Australian and Indonesian law officials in the so-called war on terror.
This scenario explains several otherwise inexplicable aspects to the case. It is absurd to imagine that a 4 kg bag of marijuana could simply be “forgotten” by baggage-handlers involved in smuggling. It was not forgotten: it was a deliberate diversion. It explains how the customs officials in Denpasar knew to expect and watch for the boogie board with the planted drugs in it. It explains Mick Keelty’s very strange public comments on the case, which in Australia would have certainly resulted in contempt of court charges. And it explains why the Bali Nine were arrested in Denpasar, rather than, as is usual standard operational procedure, permitting the heroin consignment to be delivered to its ultimate destination in order to identify and arrest the ringleaders.
And it explains the strange indifference of the Australian government to what is blindingly obvious, and that is the innocence of Schapelle Corby. She is a pawn in a much larger game.
As mentioned previously above in a couple of posts – weather she is guilty or not at this stage is not the issue – she has been found guilty. Theories – conspiracy or otherwise again do not matter. Any event similar to this will always be seen from many angles, any number of which may or may not be correct.
The fact of the matter now is that if the Australian Govt and the Indonesion Govt are to set up a prisoner exchange in the future, the last thing both want is it being played out in full public view. Having lived in Asia for many years you can never under estimate the importance of “giving/having face” in front of your friends/neighbours/contacts etc. this concept works at all levels and at a govt level, with the continued outbursts from australia on an emotional level, it will only serve to give all the more reason for the Indonesions to dig their heals in and not be open to giving any concessions. If Australia wants her back , the public need to accept what has happened and allow the govt back channels to do their thing and just maybe quietly a few years down the track they will agree to a release/transfer to Australia.
I have my own opinon as to wether she is guilty or not and I concur with a previous post that the public has not had the full background – there are facts out there that need to be considered.
To all those posters who have attacked those posting here with opinions different to their own, it’s time to grow up and look at this objectivly from a factual point of view not an emotional one.
As mentioned previously above in a couple of posts – weather she is guilty or not at this stage is not the issue – she has been found guilty. Theories – conspiracy or otherwise again do not matter. Any event similar to this will always be seen from many angles, any number of which may or may not be correct.
The fact of the matter now is that if the Australian Govt and the Indonesion Govt are to set up a prisoner exchange in the future, the last thing both want is it being played out in full public view. Having lived in Asia for many years you can never under estimate the importance of “giving/having face” in front of your friends/neighbours/contacts etc. this concept works at all levels and at a govt level, with the continued outbursts from australia on an emotional level, it will only serve to give all the more reason for the Indonesions to dig their heals in and not be open to giving any concessions. If Australia wants her back , the public need to accept what has happened and allow the govt back channels to do their thing and just maybe quietly a few years down the track they will agree to a release/transfer to Australia.
I have my own opinon as to wether she is guilty or not and I concur with a previous post that the public has not had the full background – there are facts out there that need to be considered.
To all those posters who have attacked those posting here with opinions different to their own, it’s time to grow up and look at this objectivly from a factual point of view not an emotional one.
As mentioned previously above in a couple of posts – weather she is guilty or not at this stage is not the issue – she has been found guilty. Theories – conspiracy or otherwise again do not matter. Any event similar to this will always be seen from many angles, any number of which may or may not be correct.
The fact of the matter now is that if the Australian Govt and the Indonesion Govt are to set up a prisoner exchange in the future, the last thing both want is it being played out in full public view. Having lived in Asia for many years you can never under estimate the importance of “giving/having face” in front of your friends/neighbours/contacts etc. this concept works at all levels and at a govt level, with the continued outbursts from australia on an emotional level, it will only serve to give all the more reason for the Indonesions to dig their heals in and not be open to giving any concessions. If Australia wants her back , the public need to accept what has happened and allow the govt back channels to do their thing and just maybe quietly a few years down the track they will agree to a release/transfer to Australia.
I have my own opinon as to wether she is guilty or not and I concur with a previous post that the public has not had the full background – there are facts out there that need to be considered.
To all those posters who have attacked those posting here with opinions different to their own, it’s time to grow up and look at this objectivly from a factual point of view not an emotional one.
Even if she did take the drugs into the country, (which makes no sense as the value decreases) she should not be locked up for so long, it is a stupid mistake made once and does not deserve 20 years. She is human.
I’m sorry but iv’e had a a change of heart on the Schapelle Corby case….it’s turned from ANGER to PURE HATRED of the Indonesian Govt….after all the help we have given them they spit in our faces….i can’t think of worse people in the entire world…they stink so much the stench is reaching Australia, we should not follow the advise of our gutless Prime Minister and Defense Minister, we as a nation should never have any dealings of any kind with these putrid people, people of Austalia unite…dont buy Indonesian, don’t travel there, and DON’T HELP THEM in any way.
-ray- (Perth W.A.)
Ray,
I think you’re the one who sent biological material and terrorize our embassy in canberra. I’ll tell you mate, it was a good action to put Corby on a longer sentence. I think lifetime imprisonment is enough for her. You simply make a change of our government feeling on this case. From “dont care” to “pure hatred”. So, let say byebye to your poor Corby.
And Ray, dont forget to visit this:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/schapelle/
i would like to be able to contact shapelles sister as we are going to bali next week and would like to able to give her some essentials. can anyone help me with this. thought of going to the jail but now sure whether will be allowed and not sure whether i may be a good value visitor.
The Indonesian government are a pack of vile bastards! Karma on them!!Boycott the country Watch TV instead. It is safer. Schapelle will be free one day. Bring it on!Maybe it’s god’s wrath that a tsnunami struck! Shame on the Indonesians. Greed and the love of money is the root of all evil.This is total injustice.
The Indonesian government are a pack of vile bastards! Karma on them!!Boycott the country Watch TV instead. It is safer. Schapelle will be free one day. Bring it on!Maybe it’s god’s wrath that a tsnunami struck! Shame on the Indonesians. Greed and the love of money is the root of all evil.This is total injustice.
The Indonesian government are a pack of vile bastards! Karma on them!!Boycott this country Watch TV instead. It is safer. Schapelle will be free one day. Bring it on!Maybe it’s god’s wrath that a tsnunami struck! Shame on the Indonesians. Greed and the love of money is the root of all evil.This is total injustice.The truth will win in the end.
The Indonesian government are a pack of vile bastards! Karma on them!!Boycott this country Watch TV instead. It is safer. Schapelle will be free one day. Bring it on!Maybe it’s god’s wrath that a tsnunami struck! Shame on the Indonesians. Greed and the love of money is the root of all evil.This is total injustice.The truth will win in the end.
The Indonesian government are a pack of vile bastards! Karma on them!!Boycott this country Watch TV instead. It is safer. Schapelle will be free one day. Bring it on!Maybe it’s god’s wrath that a tsnunami struck! Shame on the Indonesians. Greed and the love of money is the root of all evil.This is total injustice.The truth will win in the end.
Carla, enough of this ok. You want to blame the Indonesian Govt or all the Indonesians? I’m interested to know what is your version of the Truth….
Yes Carla.. get over it.Schapelle had the ganja in her possesion.What are they supposed to do…?
She has not proved her innocence..
she is guilty why would she even open her bags to security if you knew if they were in your bag. She’s not that dumb?? I dont need to write a long parragraph coz you dont need to know that much only that i know in my heart that she really is GUILTY
Schapelle Corby is innocent all the way, believe you Schapell!!!! Good luck!!!! i hope you get out soon!!!!!
Sorry i spelt Schapelle’s name wrongin my last comment!!!!!!
Sorry i spelt Schapelle’s name wrong in my last comment!!!!!!
Sorry i spelt Schapelle’s name wrong in my last comment!!!!!!
I wish everyone would get over the Schapelle thing
Guilty or Innocent…? Who Cares…? she had the Ganja in her possesion and thats that !
Get over it everyone..!!
She is innocent in my books and with that said I also believe that many other innocents could be sitting in their jails. Predomenantly Australians. I don’t mean that theyre all innocent, just some perhaps. Schapelle was too excited to open her bag up infront of officials as if she wasn’t aware of the stashed items. You can’t act the way she did without winning a Oscar for it. The girl had light in her eyes. I would question the brother and perhaps even the have airports within bali investigated. That HOTMAN is trying to make the aussie govts look bad with lack of cooperation comments. He’s never lost a case, perhaps he’s worried.
hi i’d like to send some gifts and mail to shapelle corby is there anyone who can email me
her address so i can send stuff to the prison she’s in it’s so awful i know she’s innocent
please get back to me soon take care and gOD BLESS
LEXIE
hi i’d like to send some gifts and mail to shapelle corby is there anyone who can email me
her address so i can send stuff to the prison she’s in it’s so awful i know she’s innocent
please get back to me soon take care and gOD BLESS
LEXIE
HI im sorry to say this but your story dosn’t satisfy me i do not believe you are innocent and i thinkyou should stay in jail because i don’t like what ayou have done and my friend thinks that you are innocent but i ask her y because you don’[t have a real good story or no eviden ceproves you are innocent i mean how did the drugs fit into your bag so Goodly?Well thanx for you time goodbye and have fun?
to reply to the posting on Aug, 16th: If your going to try and make a statement and sound like you know what your talking about, it would be a good idea to learn how to spell. what an idiot.. I guess thats why they didnt want to put their name.
to reply to the posting on Aug, 16th: If your going to try and make a statement and sound like you know what your talking about, it would be a good idea to learn how to spell. what an idiot.. I guess thats why they didnt want to put their name.
Does anyone know why ron bakir helped support her case….he is the biggest drug dealer on the gold coast, he doesnt even make his money from mobile phones….why do i know this, well, sadly i was once a drug user myself and it was a known fact that he was a the big guy behind the deals. why else would he help her….i dont know if schapelle is guilty or not, but i believe ron must have something to do with it….probably feels guilty, as his guys werent there to pick it the drugs in sydney.
Does anyone know why ron bakir helped support her case….he is the biggest drug dealer on the gold coast, he doesnt even make his money from mobile phones….why do i know this, well, sadly i was once a drug user myself and it was a known fact that he was a the big guy behind the deals. why else would he help her….i dont know if schapelle is guilty or not, but i believe ron must have something to do with it….probably feels guilty, as his guys werent there to pick it the drugs in sydney.
Does anyone know why ron bakir helped support her case….he is the biggest drug dealer on the gold coast, he doesnt even make his money from mobile phones….why do i know this, well, sadly i was once a drug user myself and it was a known fact that he was a the big guy behind the deals. why else would he help her….i dont know if schapelle is guilty or not, but i believe ron must have something to do with it….probably feels guilty, as his guys werent there to pick it the drugs in sydney.
the thing that worries me is the small mindedness of the people that are boycotting Indonesia. i realise we all have an oppinion on this and mine is quite obviosly being that we still should holiday there and enjoy the beauty of the place and even more beautiful people. To the people who are only now boycotting indonesia, perhaps you should have felt stronger about this after so many people were killed and injured in the
bali bombing, instead of singling out a girl who could be innocent or perhaps could be very guilty.
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.